CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING IN THE ORGANIC FOOD MARKET: A DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE ON GENDER, MARITAL STATUS, AND LOCATION

Authors

  • Dr. Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay Author
  • Anupam Kumar Author

Keywords:

organic food consumption, consumer demographics, logistic regression, willingness-to pay, Random Forest, chi-square test, gender differences, marital status, rural-urban divide,,

Abstract

Organic food consumption continues to expand across emerging economies, yet the 
demographic structure of this demand remains insufficiently quantified at the intersection of gender, 
marital status, and geographic location. This study surveys 850 consumers across urban, semi-urban, and 
rural strata and applies a mixed quantitative pipeline combining chi-square association tests, one-way and 
two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), binary logistic regression, and a Random Forest ensemble 
classifier to model regular organic purchase behavior and willingness-to-pay (WTP) premiums. Results 
show a statistically significant association between location and purchase regularity (χ²=111.52, p<0.001, 
Cramer’s V=0.362), a significant gender effect on WTP premium (t=5.70, p<0.001), and a logistic model 
achieving a pseudo-R² of 0.186 with urban residence (OR=2.72) and perceived product availability 
(OR=1.95) as the strongest positive predictors. A Random Forest classifier trained on the same feature set 
achieved 72.3% test accuracy and an AUC of 0.771, with 5-fold cross-validated accuracy of 69.9% ± 
4.3%. The findings indicate that geographic accessibility and gender-linked health orientation, rather than 
marital status alone, are the dominant demographic drivers of organic food adoption, offering actionable 
segmentation guidance for retailers and policymakers.

,

Downloads.

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING IN THE ORGANIC FOOD MARKET: A DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE ON GENDER, MARITAL STATUS, AND LOCATION . (2026). Phoenix: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal ( Peer Reviewed High Impact Journal ), 4(3), 54-62. https://pimrj.org/index.php/pimrj/article/view/376